[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16381978#comment-16381978
 ] 

Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-5351:
-----------------------------------

I implemented support for multiple fields in the MLT handler. I also corrected 
the test which had bugs in it (expected exception block was not guarded and 
always falling through, effectively verifying nothing). I also cleaned up the 
code formatting a bit; this will obscure the patch slightly, but shouldn't be 
too bad.

If there are no objections, I'd like to commit it in soon.

> More Like This Handler uses only first field in mlt.fl when using stream.body
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5351
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5351
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: MoreLikeThis
>    Affects Versions: 4.4
>         Environment: Linux,Windows
>            Reporter: Zygmunt Wiercioch
>            Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-5351.patch
>
>
> The documentation at: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThisHandler 
> indicates that one can use multiple fields for similarity in mlt.fl:
> http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?stream.body=electronics%20memory&mlt.fl=manu,cat&mlt.interestingTerms=list&mlt.mintf=0
> In trying this, only one field is used. 
> Looking at the code, it only looks at the first field:
>  public DocListAndSet getMoreLikeThis( Reader reader, int start, int rows, 
> List<Query> filters, List<InterestingTerm> terms, int flags ) throws 
> IOException
>     {
>       // analyzing with the first field: previous (stupid) behavior
>       rawMLTQuery = mlt.like(reader, mlt.getFieldNames()[0]); 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to