[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16394355#comment-16394355
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-6520:
-----------------------------------

Attaching a patch that replaces old Wiki link with (version specific) RefGuide 
link. Also refreshed the textual description by copying what we use in the 
release note and upgraded the language to better match recent events such as 
JSON replacing HTTP/XML etc.

[~arafalov] you may want to push this in time for 7.3?

> Documentation web page is missing link to live Solr Reference Guide
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6520
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6520
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 4.10
>         Environment: web
>            Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
>            Assignee: Alexandre Rafalovitch
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation, website
>             Fix For: 7.3
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-6520.patch
>
>
> The [official document page for 
> Solr|https://lucene.apache.org/solr/documentation.html] is missing the link 
> to the live Solr Reference Guide. Only the link to PDF is there. In fact, one 
> has to go to the WIKI, it seems to find the link. 
> It is also not linked from [the release-specific documentation 
> page|https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_10_0/index.html] either.
> This means the search engines do not easily discover the new content and it 
> does not show up in searches for when people look for information. It also 
> means people may hesitate to look at it, if they have to download the whole 
> PDF first.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to