[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16402457#comment-16402457
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-11731:
-------------------------------------
Thanks for offering a great starting point. I worked on it further
significantly, esp. with testing.
* Improved testing:
** test round-trip more methodically using a RetrievalCombo class/struct to
hold index & return value
** new testLLPDecodeIsStableAndPrecise to test that the result is stable (can
be re-indexed to get the same value), and that it's precise (< 1.3 cm)
* Adjusted to BigDecimal setScale(7,CEILING) as comments indicate why.
* Ensured we only wrap in an array when the field is multiValued.
WDYT?
> LatLonPointSpatialField could be improved to return the lat/lon from docValues
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11731
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11731
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: spatial
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-11731.patch, SOLR-11731.patch, SOLR-11731.patch
>
> Time Spent: 4h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> You can only return the lat & lon from a LatLonPointSpatialField if you set
> stored=true. But we could allow this (albeit at a small loss in precision)
> if stored=false and docValues=true.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
