I was responding to a thread on the user's list and saw this. I didn't see a JIRA. I tested with 7.1, all defaults.
It seems odd to me that (apparently, I haven't traced the code) that if I specify: hl.fl=f1&hl.q=something then "something" is analyzed against the default field rather than f1 So in this particular case, f1 did some diacritic folding (GermanNormalizationFilterFactory specifically). But my guess is that the df was still "text", or at least something that didn't reference that filter. I'm defining "worked" in what follows is getting highlighting on "Kündigung" so Kündigung was indexed as Kundigung So far so good. Now if I try to highlight on f1 These work q=f1:Kündigung&hl.fl=f1 q=f1:Kündigung&hl.fl=f1&hl.q=Kundigung <= NOTE, without umlaut This does not work q=f1:Kündigung&hl.fl=f1&hl.q=Kündigung <= NOTE, with umlaut Testing this locally, I'd get the highlighting if I defined df as "f1" in all the above cases. Worth a JIRA? Or a doc note? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
