[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13060180#comment-13060180
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1768:
---------------------------------------

I think the "bug" in Contrib QP is there because it's also a bug in Lucene's 
Core QP (the default impl just emulates core's QP). But in my opinion, it 
should have separate include/exclude for both limits, so a query like {1 TO 2] 
should behave as expected.

The QP should in my opinion also support open-ended ranges. The syntax by 
NumericRangeQuery's toString() is by using stars (this is also what Solr's QP 
does). For numeric fields, half open ranges are important, as it supports 
queries like "price < 2.00 Dollar". Wasn't there not also an issue open to 
support other syntax for numerics like > and < operators?

> NumericRange support for new query parser
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1768
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/queryparser
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Adriano Crestani
>              Labels: contrib, gsoc, gsoc2011, lucene-gsoc-11, mentor
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: week1.patch, week2.patch, week3.patch, week4.patch, 
> week5-6.patch
>
>
> It would be good to specify some type of "schema" for the query parser in 
> future, to automatically create NumericRangeQuery for different numeric 
> types? It would then be possible to index a numeric value 
> (double,float,long,int) using NumericField and then the query parser knows, 
> which type of field this is and so it correctly creates a NumericRangeQuery 
> for strings like "[1.567..*]" or "(1.787..19.5]".
> There is currently no way to extract if a field is numeric from the index, so 
> the user will have to configure the FieldConfig objects in the ConfigHandler. 
> But if this is done, it will not be that difficult to implement the rest.
> The only difference between the current handling of RangeQuery is then the 
> instantiation of the correct Query type and conversion of the entered numeric 
> values (simple Number.valueOf(...) cast of the user entered numbers). 
> Evenerything else is identical, NumericRangeQuery also supports the MTQ 
> rewrite modes (as it is a MTQ).
> Another thing is a change in Date semantics. There are some strange flags in 
> the current parser that tells it how to handle dates.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to