[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16443928#comment-16443928
]
Karl Wright commented on LUCENE-8258:
-------------------------------------
Debugging output shows that the outside-outside point of the dual traversal
doesn't lie on the world:
{code}
[junit4] 1> Calling pickProximate for outsideOutside point for plane
intersection of [A=0.0, B=0.0; C=1.0; D=-3.590718044207102E-6] and [A=1.0,
B=0.0; C=0.0; D=-0.9999999999942558]
{code}
This is very close to being a single-edge traversal -- it misses by a small
fraction.
The second plane is very very close to being eliminated by the check [~ivera]
added. I think we may just need to tighten up those checks further. We need
MINIMUM_RESOLUTION either way in order to guarantee that the envelopes
intersect the world. What do you think?
> GeoComplexPolygon fails computing traversals
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8258
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8258
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/spatial3d
> Reporter: Ignacio Vera
> Assignee: Karl Wright
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8258.jpg, LUCENE-8258.patch
>
>
> There are some situations when checking for memebership for a
> GeoComplexPolygon results in the following error:
> {{java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No off-plane intersection points were
> found; can't compute traversal}}
> It seems the intersection of auxiliary planes created is outside of the world.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
