In the past I've had to ping the dev list with an "include patch XYZ
please" message....

But I've just assigned it to myself, I'll see if I can get it
committed, I'm new enough at the process that I need the practice....

Best
Erick

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Smiley, David W. <[email protected]> wrote:
> How do committers recommend that patch contributors (like me) get their 
> patches committed?  At the moment I'm thinking of this one:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2535
> This is a regression bug. I found the bug, I added a patch which fixes the 
> bug and tested that it was fixed.  The tests are actually new tests that 
> tested code that wasn't tested before.  I put the "fix version" in JIRA as 
> 3.3 at the time I did this, because it was ready to go.  Well 3.3 came and 
> went, and the version got bumped to 3.4.  There are no processes in place for 
> committers to recognize completed patches.  I think that's a problem.  It's 
> very discouraging, as the contributor.  I think prior to a release and 
> ideally at other occasions, issues assigned to the next release number should 
> actually be examined.    Granted there are ~250 of them on the Solr side: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+SOLR+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+fixVersion+%3D+12316683+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC
>  And some initial triage could separate the wheat from the chaff.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to