[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16462585#comment-16462585
]
Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on SOLR-11490:
----------------------------------------------
19 Oct, me: "Sure. Let's do 3.1+ as a joint tag and ignore anything before
that. I'll roll-back the earlier ones."
Perhaps I misunderstood. I thought it makes no sense to tag something that's
been in lucene 1.x as 3.1, and read it that you meant to tag it not at all. So,
my proposal now is to tag it "pre-3.1". Maybe we are on the same page.
> Add @since javadoc tags to the interesting Solr/Lucene classes
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11490
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Assignee: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Priority: Minor
>
> As per the discussion on the dev list, it may be useful to add Javadoc since
> tags to significant (or even all) Java files.
> For user-facing files (such as analyzers, URPs, stream evaluators, etc) it
> would be useful when trying to identifying whether a particular class only
> comes later than user's particular version.
> For other classes, it may be useful for historical reasons.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
