[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Smiley resolved SOLR-12258.
---------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
         Assignee: David Smiley
    Fix Version/s: 7.4

> V2 API should "retry" for unresolved collections/aliases (like V1 does)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12258
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12258
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: SolrCloud, v2 API
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 7.4
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-12258.patch, SOLR-12258.patch
>
>
> When using V1, if the request refers to a possible collection/alias that 
> fails to resolve, HttpSolrCall will invoke AliasesManager.update() then retry 
> the request as if anew (in collaboration with SolrDispatchFilter).  If it 
> fails to resolve again we stop there and return an error; it doesn't go on 
> forever.
> V2 (V2HttpCall specifically) doesn't have this retry mechanism.  It'll return 
> "no such collection or alias".
> The retry will not only work for an alias but the retrying is a delay that 
> will at least help the odds of a newly made collection from being known to 
> this Solr node.  It'd be nice if this was more explicit – i.e. if there was a 
> mechanism similar to AliasesManager.update() but for a collection.  I'm not 
> sure how to do that?
> BTW I discovered this while debugging a Jenkins failure of 
> TimeRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.test where it early on simply goes to 
> issue a V2 based request to change the configuration of a collection that was 
> created immediately before it.  It's pretty mysterious.  I am aware of 
> SolrCloudTestCase.waitForState which is maybe something that needs to be 
> called?  But if that were true then *every* SolrCloud test would need to use 
> it; it just seems wrong to me that we ought to use this method commonly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to