[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16468082#comment-16468082
 ] 

Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-12298:
-----------------------------------------

bq. I'm proposing removing explicit SolrInputField._childDocuments in favor of 
having fields contains child document values.
[~dsmiley], I've found some by considerations by [~hossman] 
[here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3535?focusedCommentId=13295189&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-13295189].
 Personally I don't have strong opinion. 

> Index Full nested document Hierarchy For Queries (umbrella issue)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12298
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12298
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: mosh
>            Priority: Major
>
> Solr ought to have the ability to index deeply nested objects, while storing 
> the original document hierarchy.
>  Currently the client has to index the child document's full path and level 
> to manually reconstruct the original document structure, since the children 
> are flattened and returned in the reserved "__childDocuments__" key.
> Ideally you could index a nested document, having Solr transparently add the 
> required fields while providing a document transformer to rebuild the 
> original document's hierarchy.
>  
> This issue is an umbrella issue for the particular tasks that will make it 
> all happen – either subtasks or issue linking.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to