One candidate for an errata entry could be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12321 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12321> do document that 7.3 broke back compat with 7.2. This should normally have been documented in CHANGES Upgrade Notes.
Perhaps there should be a link to the errata page from the top of CHANGES.txt, and from the beginning of the reference guide such as "About This Guide"? -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 9. mai 2018 kl. 23:54 skrev Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com>: > > Yeah, you're right - it's parameterized using a bad parameter. I've often > thought, though, that it should go away - we never update it and having a > page that refers to itself online is weird. Thoughts? Anyone really want this > page and intend to update it? I likely won't ever unless I get a ton of extra > time somehow. > > As for the comments, I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12018 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12018> months ago. > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:51 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com > <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>> wrote: > See https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/errata.html > <https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/errata.html> > The link on that page says /7.3/… but should be /7_3/… so it is a 404 now, > and probably also in the PDF. > > PS: The Apache Comments section is not active > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com <http://www.cominvent.com/> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >
