[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474157#comment-16474157
 ] 

Jan Høydahl edited comment on LUCENE-8264 at 5/14/18 1:05 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

[~erickerickson] check out SOLR-10046 which seems to do what you want in <2> 
already through 
{{[UninvertDocValuesMergePolicyFactory|https://lucene.apache.org/solr/7_3_0/solr-core/index.html?org/apache/solr/index/UninvertDocValuesMergePolicyFactory.html]}},
 or do I misunderstand?


was (Author: janhoy):
[~erickerickson] check out SOLR-10046 which seems to do what you want in <2> 
through {{UninvertDocValuesMergePolicyFactory }}already, or do I misunderstand?

> Allow an option to rewrite all segments
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8264
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>            Priority: Major
>
> For the background, see SOLR-12259.
> There are several use-cases that would be much easier, especially during 
> upgrades, if we could specify that all segments get rewritten. 
> One example: Upgrading 5x->6x->7x. When segments are merged, they're 
> rewritten into the current format. However, there's no guarantee that a 
> particular segment _ever_ gets merged so the 6x-7x upgrade won't necessarily 
> be successful.
> How many merge policies support this is an open question. I propose to start 
> with TMP and raise other JIRAs as necessary for other merge policies.
> So far the usual response has been "re-index from scratch", but that's 
> increasingly difficult as systems get larger.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to