> The taxonomy is global to the index, but I think it will be > interesting to explore per-segment taxonomy, and how it can be used to > improve indexing or search perf (hopefully both)
Right so with NRT this'll be an issue. Is there a write up on this? It sounds fairly radical in design. Eg, I'm curious as to how it compares with the bit set and un-inverted field cache based faceting systems. On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: > Currently it doesn't facet per segment, because the approach it uses > is irrelevant to per segment. > > It maintains a count array in the size of the taxonomy and every > matching document contributes to the weight of the categories it is > associated with, orregardless of the segment it is found in. > > The taxonomy is global to the index, but I think it will be > interesting to explore per-segment taxonomy, and how it can be used to > improve indexing or search perf (hopefully both). > > Shai > > On Saturday, July 9, 2011, Jason Rutherglen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Is it faceting per-segment? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
