[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16484694#comment-16484694
]
Oliver Bates commented on SOLR-12378:
-------------------------------------
{quote}Did you intentionally mispell an existing comment RE "identiy" ?
{quote}
Lol yeah I'm just here to wreak havoc. Actually that typo existed in an older
version of the file, which my original patch was based on (and I had actually
fixed that typo too!) but I clearly messed something up when I rebased on the
latest** master.
{quote}Can you please update your patch for master? This file was recently
split in two.
{quote}
**Obviously not latest enough.
Sorry about that. [~tomasflobbe] actually mentioned to me a couple days ago
that the files had changed but I didn't get a chance to fix it yet. Will upload
a new patch later today.
> Support missing versionField on indexed docs in DocBasedVersionConstraintsURP
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12378
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12378
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: UpdateRequestProcessors
> Affects Versions: master (8.0)
> Reporter: Oliver Bates
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: features, patch
> Attachments: supportMissingVersionOnOldDocs-v1.patch
>
>
> -If we want to start using DocBasedVersionConstraintsUpdateRequestProcessor
> on an existing index, we have to reindex everything to set value for the
> 'versionField' field, otherwise- We can't start using
> DocBasedVersionConstraintsUpdateRequestProcessor on an existing index because
> we get this line throwing shade:
> {code:java}
> throw new SolrException(SERVER_ERROR,
> "Doc exists in index, but has null versionField: "
> + versionFieldName);
> {code}
> We have to reindex everything into a new collection, which isn't always
> practical/possible. The proposal here is to have an option to allow the
> existing docs to be missing this field and to simply treat those docs as
> older than anything coming in with that field set.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
