[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13063570#comment-13063570
 ] 

Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1768:
------------------------------------------

{quote}
I am not sure if this is really a break when you change inheritance. If code 
still compiles, its no break, if classes were renamed its more serious. I am 
not sure, if implementation classes (and -names) should be covered by the 
backwards compatibility. In my opinion, mainly the configuration and interfaces 
of the QP must be covered by backwards policy.
{quote}

I didn't see any class renaming, I need to double check Vinicius's patches. But 
he did change the query node inheritance, which may affect how processors and 
builder (specially QueryNodeTreeBuilder) work. I am not saying it is not 
possible to implement his approach on 3.x, but he will need to deal differently 
with query nodes classes he created. As I said before, what he did is good and 
clean, I like the way it is, but it will break someone's code if pushed to 3.x. 
So if you ask me whether to push it to 3.x, I say YES, just make sure to not 
break the query node structure that people may be relying on.

{quote}
As we are now at mid-time, it would be a good idea, to maybe add some extra 
syntax support for numerics, like "<" and ">"? We should also add tests/support 
for half-open ranges, so syntax like "[* TO 1.0]" should also be supported (I 
am not sure, if TermRangeQueryNode supports this, but numerics should do this 
in all cases) - the above syntax is also printed out on 
NumericRangeQuery.toString(), if one of the bounds is null. The latter could be 
easily implemented by checking for "*" as input to the range bounds and map 
those special "values" to NULL. Adding support for "<" and ">" (also "<=", 
">=") needs knowledge of JavaCC parser language. Vinicius, have you ever worked 
with JavaCC, so do you think you will be able to extend the syntax?
{quote}

I still need to investigate the bugs Vinicius reported (should have been 
created a JIRA for that already), I never really tried open ranges in contrib 
QP. And if Vinicius thinks he will have time and skills to do the JAVACC change 
to support those new operators, go for it! And remember Vinicius, you don't 
need to do everything during gsoc, you are always welcome to contribute code 
whenever you want :)

> NumericRange support for new query parser
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1768
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/queryparser
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>              Labels: contrib, gsoc, gsoc2011, lucene-gsoc-11, mentor
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: week-7.patch, week1.patch, week2.patch, week3.patch, 
> week4.patch, week5-6.patch
>
>
> It would be good to specify some type of "schema" for the query parser in 
> future, to automatically create NumericRangeQuery for different numeric 
> types? It would then be possible to index a numeric value 
> (double,float,long,int) using NumericField and then the query parser knows, 
> which type of field this is and so it correctly creates a NumericRangeQuery 
> for strings like "[1.567..*]" or "(1.787..19.5]".
> There is currently no way to extract if a field is numeric from the index, so 
> the user will have to configure the FieldConfig objects in the ConfigHandler. 
> But if this is done, it will not be that difficult to implement the rest.
> The only difference between the current handling of RangeQuery is then the 
> instantiation of the correct Query type and conversion of the entered numeric 
> values (simple Number.valueOf(...) cast of the user entered numbers). 
> Evenerything else is identical, NumericRangeQuery also supports the MTQ 
> rewrite modes (as it is a MTQ).
> Another thing is a change in Date semantics. There are some strange flags in 
> the current parser that tells it how to handle dates.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to