On 7/12/2011 at 5:34 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> I now think that for mass restructuring, rather than a dedicated branch,
> it's better to keep the changes as an svn movement script and a patch,
> even though this requires regular "svn diff >../my.patch ; svn --
> recursive revert . ; svn update ; patch -p0 <../my.patch" cycles to keep
> up with concurrent development.

I forgot to include the svn movement script - the full cycle is: 

        svn diff >../my.patch
        svn --recursive revert .
        svn update
        ../my.svn.movement.script.sh
        patch -p0 <../my.patch

Reply via email to