On 7/12/2011 at 5:34 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > I now think that for mass restructuring, rather than a dedicated branch, > it's better to keep the changes as an svn movement script and a patch, > even though this requires regular "svn diff >../my.patch ; svn -- > recursive revert . ; svn update ; patch -p0 <../my.patch" cycles to keep > up with concurrent development.
I forgot to include the svn movement script - the full cycle is: svn diff >../my.patch svn --recursive revert . svn update ../my.svn.movement.script.sh patch -p0 <../my.patch