[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Smiley resolved SOLR-11654.
---------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 7.5

Thanks; I'm glad that was simple.  I added some \@Slow and \@Nightly 
annotations here.

Beasted, ran all tests, and finally committed: 
[https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;a=commit;h=bc9ac994a4d738faec00f42b1cd3585bd2570c65]
    

I put you as the "Author" in git – something we don't really have a 
policy/practice for/against but I figure it makes sense to do this for 
contributors.

> TimePartitionedUpdateProcessor.lookupShardLeaderOfCollection should route to 
> the ideal shard
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11654
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11654
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: SolrCloud
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 7.5
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-11654.patch, SOLR-11654.patch, SOLR-11654.patch, 
> SOLR-11654.patch, SOLR-11654.patch
>
>
> {{TimePartitionedUpdateProcessor.lookupShardLeaderOfCollection}} looks up the 
> Shard/Slice to talk to for the given collection.  It currently picks the 
> first active Shard/Slice but it has a TODO to route to the ideal one based on 
> the router configuration of the target collection.  There is similar code in 
> CloudSolrClient & DistributedUpdateProcessor that should probably be 
> refactored/standardized so that we don't have to repeat this logic.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to