[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16522624#comment-16522624 ]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-5211: ------------------------------------ Feel free to propose a trial patch with such a change. I wonder if your proposal would be better/worse -- I'm not sure. Note that there are some external callers that want a Lucene Document from the command as well. A cursory look at your patch looked fine... and I can see that there is some awkwardness in conditionally adding the block ID prompting your suggestion to decouple Document conversion about of the command. Separately in SOLR-12441 I proposed maybe \_root\_ manipulation should be done in an URP, the one being added in that issue. > updating parent as childless makes old children orphans > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-5211 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: update > Affects Versions: 4.5, 6.0 > Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev > Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-5211.patch, SOLR-5211.patch, SOLR-5211.patch > > > if I have parent with children in the index, I can send update omitting > children. as a result old children become orphaned. > I suppose separate \_root_ fields makes much trouble. I propose to extend > notion of uniqueKey, and let it spans across blocks that makes updates > unambiguous. > WDYT? Do you like to see a test proves this issue? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org