[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16525114#comment-16525114
]
Steve Rowe edited comment on LUCENE-8369 at 6/27/18 1:57 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
bq. RE Yetus: I am not sure but I think it failed because it tried to run tests
for an affected module that was actually entirely deleted, which isn't a
supported scenario of Yetus.
I looked at the patch, and it appears to have been generated by IntelliJ. In
my experience native git tooling doesn't interact well with such patches. But
more generally I think you're right: deleted modules probably aren't handled
well by Yetus and/or our project's Yetus "personality".
was (Author: steve_rowe):
bq. RE Yetus: I am not sure but I think it failed because it tried to run tests
for an affected module that was actually entirely deleted, which isn't a
supported scenario of Yetus.
I looked at the patch, and it appears to have been generated by IntelliJ. In
my experience native git tooling doesn't interact well with such patches.
> Remove the spatial module as it is obsolete
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8369
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8369
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: modules/spatial
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8369.patch
>
>
> The "spatial" module is at this juncture nearly empty with only a couple
> utilities that aren't used by anything in the entire codebase --
> GeoRelationUtils, and MortonEncoder. Perhaps it should have been removed
> earlier in LUCENE-7664 which was the removal of GeoPointField which was
> essentially why the module existed. Better late than never.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
