[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065344#comment-13065344
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3314:
---------------------------------------
I just wanted to make clear, that this test in 3.x was always supported and
"did the right thing"(tm). In my opinion, we can change the semantics in trunk
and simply remove that additional assert in the test. On the other hand, I
would prefer to throw IllegalStateEx after you call next() too often (like
ju.Iterators do).
> TestNumericRangeQuery test failure
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3314
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3314
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/Lucene/job/Lucene-trunk/1624/testReport/org.apache.lucene.search/TestNumericRangeQuery32/testEnum/
> ant test -Dtestcase=TestNumericRangeQuery32 -Dtestmethod=testEnum
> -Dtests.seed=-3603272894684698645:-1998239306864854687 -Dtests.multiplier=3
> -Dtests.nightly=true
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
