Hoss Man created SOLR-12582:
-------------------------------
Summary: Consider api/documentation synergies/overlap between JSON
Faceting relatedness() function and significantTerms sreaming expression
Key: SOLR-12582
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12582
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
Reporter: Hoss Man
In SOLR-12581, Alexandre asked the tangential question below, which i've spun
off into it's own jira...
{quote}
Sort of a side-question, but this work _\[adding new options to the JSON
faceting relatedness() aggregation\]_ seems to overlap/compliment the
significantTerms work done for streaming/QueryParser:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/stream-source-reference.html#significantterms
Are we saying SignificantTerms is for simpler use cases (as fore/back queries
are corpus-wide) and then go into relatedness() for more complex analysis?
Should the options be roughly compatible where it makes sense and/or similarly
named?
Just wondering because I could see this confusing newbies trying to see when to
use which option.
{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
