[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cassandra Targett updated SOLR-12582:
-------------------------------------
Component/s: streaming expressions
> Consider api/documentation synergies/overlap between JSON Faceting
> relatedness() function and significantTerms sreaming expression
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12582
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12582
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Facet Module, streaming expressions
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Priority: Major
>
> In SOLR-12581, Alexandre asked the tangential question below, which i've spun
> off into it's own jira...
> {quote}
> Sort of a side-question, but this work _\[adding new options to the JSON
> faceting relatedness() aggregation\]_ seems to overlap/compliment the
> significantTerms work done for streaming/QueryParser:
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/stream-source-reference.html#significantterms
> Are we saying SignificantTerms is for simpler use cases (as fore/back queries
> are corpus-wide) and then go into relatedness() for more complex analysis?
> Should the options be roughly compatible where it makes sense and/or
> similarly named?
> Just wondering because I could see this confusing newbies trying to see when
> to use which option.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
