[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16576607#comment-16576607
]
Bar Rotstein commented on SOLR-12591:
-------------------------------------
Another question that has come to mind, is whether the URP should mimic
DateExtractionUtil, and provide a public API to build a DateFormatter, or
whether the formatters used should be strictly be only the ones provided in the
configuration?
> Ensure ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory can be used instead of
> ExtractionDateUtil
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12591
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12591
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (8.0)
>
>
> ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory should ideally be able to handle the
> cases that ExtractionDateUtil does in the "extraction" contrib module. Tests
> should be added, ported from patches in SOLR-12561 that enhance
> TestExtractionDateUtil to similarly ensure the URP is tested. I think in
> this issue, I should switch out Joda time for java.time as well (though leave
> the complete removal for SOLR-12586) if it any changes are actually necessary
> – they probably will be.
> Once this issue is complete, it should be appropriate to gut date time
> parsing out of the "extraction" contrib module – a separate issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
