[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13069536#comment-13069536
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3097:
--------------------------------------------

Hmm I hit a test failure w/ this patch:
{noformat}
ant test -Dtestcase=TermAllGroupHeadsCollectorTest 
-Dtestmethod=testRetrieveGroupHeadsAsArrayAndOpenBitset 
-Dtests.seed=-8084704095495262480:-1926953444883897447
{noformat}

Also: can this collector use the new FixedBitSet instead of OpenBitSet...?

> Post grouping faceting
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3097
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: modules/grouping
>            Reporter: Martijn van Groningen
>            Assignee: Martijn van Groningen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.4, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3097.patch, LUCENE-3097.patch, LUCENE-3097.patch, 
> LUCENE-30971.patch
>
>
> This issues focuses on implementing post grouping faceting.
> * How to handle multivalued fields. What field value to show with the facet.
> * Where the facet counts should be based on
> ** Facet counts can be based on the normal documents. Ungrouped counts. 
> ** Facet counts can be based on the groups. Grouped counts.
> ** Facet counts can be based on the combination of group value and facet 
> value. Matrix counts.   
> And properly more implementation options.
> The first two methods are implemented in the SOLR-236 patch. For the first 
> option it calculates a DocSet based on the individual documents from the 
> query result. For the second option it calculates a DocSet for all the most 
> relevant documents of a group. Once the DocSet is computed the FacetComponent 
> and StatsComponent use one the DocSet to create facets and statistics.  
> This last one is a bit more complex. I think it is best explained with an 
> example. Lets say we search on travel offers:
> |||hotel||departure_airport||duration||
> |Hotel a|AMS|5
> |Hotel a|DUS|10
> |Hotel b|AMS|5
> |Hotel b|AMS|10
> If we group by hotel and have a facet for airport. Most end users expect 
> (according to my experience off course) the following airport facet:
> AMS: 2
> DUS: 1
> The above result can't be achieved by the first two methods. You either get 
> counts AMS:3 and DUS:1 or 1 for both airports.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to