[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16589802#comment-16589802
]
mosh edited comment on SOLR-12685 at 8/23/18 7:04 AM:
------------------------------------------------------
{quote}in RTG we need the realtime searcher
{quote}
Oh right I guess I sort of missed that part...
{quote}I'm also dubious you needed to change the method signature in RTG to
take SolrQueryRequest; we'll see.
{quote}
I guess if there is no need for req.getSearcher(), I do not foresee a need to
pass req as a parameter.
was (Author: moshebla):
{quote}in RTG we need the realtime searcher{quote}
Oh right I guess I sort of missed that part...
{quote} I'm also dubious you needed to change the method signature in RTG to
take SolrQueryRequest; we'll see.{quote}
I guess if there is no need for req#getSearcher, I do not foresee a need to
pass req as a parameter.
> RTG should return the whole block if schema is nested
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12685
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12685
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: mosh
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12638-no-commit.patch
>
>
> Currently Solr's RealTimeGet component return the document if provided a
> docId when consulting the index. For AtomicUpdates for child documents, RTG
> should return the whole block when dealing with a nested schema.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
