[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16603156#comment-16603156
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-12685:
-------------------------------------

You make a good argument for consistency; I think we should keep the current 
behavior (i.e. only get child documents if you ask).

Your new title of this issue seems to be conflated with SOLR-12638, and no 
longer suggests this subsumes SOLR-9006.  So it's pretty confusing what's going 
on, to me.  I think it's fine for SOLR-12638 to touch RTG code as its 
implementation details; no need to have a separate issue unless you think it's 
sufficiently distinct for whatever reason (e.g. if it accomplishes some other 
useful benefit, _and_ there is work to do in SOLR-12638 that is separate and if 
they could be committed separately without disrupting things).  In light of 
that, perhaps mark this issue closed?

> RTG should Support atomic updates of nested/child documents for 
> nested-enabled schema
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12685
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: mosh
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-12638-no-commit.patch
>
>
> Currently Solr's RealTimeGet component return the document if provided a 
> docId when consulting the index. For AtomicUpdates for child documents, RTG 
> should return the whole block when dealing with a nested schema.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to