[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16614161#comment-16614161
 ] 

Cao Manh Dat edited comment on SOLR-12639 at 9/13/18 11:51 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

I don't think there are any thing like fallback to HTTP 1.1 right now. But does 
Solr support NTLM?

Even someone try to do that, I don't think this will be a pleasure experience 
since Apache HttpClient does not support more than one challenge response.


was (Author: caomanhdat):
I don't think there are any thing like fallback to HTTP 1.1 right now. But does 
Solr support NTLM right now?

> Umbrella JIRA for adding support HTTP/2, jira/http2
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12639
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12639
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: http2
>            Reporter: Cao Manh Dat
>            Assignee: Cao Manh Dat
>            Priority: Major
>
> This ticket will aim to replace/add support of http2 by using jetty HTTP 
> client to Solr. All the works will be committed to jira/http2 branch. This 
> branch will be served like a stepping stone between the master branch and 
> Mark Miller starburst branch. I will try to keep jira/http2 as close as 
> master as possible (this will make merging in the future easier). In the same 
> time, changes in starburst branch will be split into smaller/testable parts 
> then push it to jira/http2 branch. 
> Anyone who interests at http2 for Solr can use jira/http2 branch but there is 
> no backward-compatibility guarantee.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to