[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630027#comment-16630027
 ] 

Julien Massiera commented on SOLR-12798:
----------------------------------------

Hi [~janhoy],

The /extract update handler is misleading in the case of the log I shared with 
you as it is not the original update/extract of Solr but a custom one that is 
NOT using Tika. Because, like you said, the document has already been parsed by 
the Tika of MCF. 

The 1) that you mentioned is definitely not a recommended solution in a 
production environment cause, till now, I experienced a lot of OOM when Tika 
has to deal with exotic files. As we use Solr as the search engine and we 
cannot afford to have an interruption of service when indexing phase, this 
proposal is not an option. 

 

> Structural changes in SolrJ since version 7.0.0 have effectively disabled 
> multipart post
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12798
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12798
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: SolrJ
>    Affects Versions: 7.4
>            Reporter: Karl Wright
>            Assignee: Karl Wright
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HOT Balloon Trip_Ultra HD.jpg, 
> SOLR-12798-approach.patch, solr-update-request.txt
>
>
> Project ManifoldCF uses SolrJ to post documents to Solr.  When upgrading from 
> SolrJ 7.0.x to SolrJ 7.4, we encountered significant structural changes to 
> SolrJ's HttpSolrClient class that seemingly disable any use of multipart 
> post.  This is critical because ManifoldCF's documents often contain metadata 
> in excess of 4K that therefore cannot be stuffed into a URL.
> The changes in question seem to have been performed by Paul Noble on 
> 10/31/2017, with the introduction of the RequestWriter mechanism.  Basically, 
> if a request has a RequestWriter, it is used exclusively to write the 
> request, and that overrides the stream mechanism completely.  I haven't 
> chased it back to a specific ticket.
> ManifoldCF's usage of SolrJ involves the creation of 
> ContentStreamUpdateRequests for all posts meant for Solr Cell, and the 
> creation of UpdateRequests for posts not meant for Solr Cell (as well as for 
> delete and commit requests).  For our release cycle that is taking place 
> right now, we're shipping a modified version of HttpSolrClient that ignores 
> the RequestWriter when dealing with ContentStreamUpdateRequests.  We 
> apparently cannot use multipart for all requests because on the Solr side we 
> get "pfountz Should not get here!" errors on the Solr side when we do, which 
> generate HTTP error code 500 responses.  That should not happen either, in my 
> opinion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to