[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16654045#comment-16654045
]
Jim Ferenczi commented on LUCENE-8535:
--------------------------------------
+1 to support this through the extension points. We can add javadocs explaining
why we don't handle all queries in the relevant class
(WeightedSpanTermsExtractor).
> Should we drop support for highlighting block-join queris
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8535
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: master (8.0)
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Major
>
> This is a spin-off from LUCENE-6572. We currently depend on the block-join
> module which is due to the fact that we try to highlight the queries wrapped
> by the block join queries. The current discussion on LUCENE-6572 mentioned
> that this doesn't make much sense from an highlighting perspecitve and if we
> should drop support for it. Lucene 8.0 would be a good time to do so.
> Thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
