[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16654347#comment-16654347
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-12856:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 8bef01c9055418be660a1c5649956c2d0cc543e7 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_7x from [~gerlowskija]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=8bef01c ]

SOLR-12856: Small improvements to SolrJ javadocs


> Improve javadocs for public SolrJ classes
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12856
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12856
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: documentation, SolrJ
>    Affects Versions: 7.5
>            Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
>            Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-12856.patch
>
>
> While poking around some SolrJ code, I noticed that the Javadoc documentation 
> tends to be spotty.  Some sections have pretty meticulous descriptions, 
> others are missing javadocs entirely.
> I'm not aiming to entirely correct that situation here, but I did want to fix 
> a few of the more serious concerns I ran into in some of my digging.  This 
> list includes:
> * SolrClient.commit should have some warning about the downside of invoking 
> commits on the client side
> * ditto re: SolrClient.rollback
> * SolrClient's single-doc add method should have a warning about performance 
> implications of not batching.  Not sure if this should live in SolrClient 
> itself and be worded as a "potential" perf impact, or live in each of the 
> clients it applies to.
> * the SolrClient builders can use some clarification around when particular 
> settings are useful.
> * ResponseParser and some other classes might benefit from some high level 
> class javadocs.
> Figured this was worth a JIRA so others can catch potential mistakes I'm 
> making here, or suggest other SolrJ things that'd really benefit from 
> Javadocs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to