Github user alessandrobenedetti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/482#discussion_r227464824
--- Diff:
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/analysis/TestStopFilter.java ---
@@ -111,20 +119,24 @@ public void testEndStopword() throws Exception {
null);
}
- private void doTestStopPositons(StopFilter stpf) throws IOException {
- CharTermAttribute termAtt = stpf.getAttribute(CharTermAttribute.class);
- PositionIncrementAttribute posIncrAtt =
stpf.getAttribute(PositionIncrementAttribute.class);
- stpf.reset();
- for (int i=0; i<20; i+=3) {
- assertTrue(stpf.incrementToken());
- log("Token "+i+": "+stpf);
- String w = English.intToEnglish(i).trim();
- assertEquals("expecting token "+i+" to be "+w,w,termAtt.toString());
- assertEquals("all but first token must have position increment of
3",i==0?1:3,posIncrAtt.getPositionIncrement());
+ private void doTestStopwordsPositions(StopFilter stopfilter) throws
IOException {
+ final int NUMBER_OF_TOKENS = 20;
+ final int DELTA = 3;
--- End diff --
Given the fact that this was in the original code, and you just refactored,
I don't like that much the fact that Delta=3 here is not a method parameter.
In fact I doubt this method is really usable if the stop filter you pass is
not precisely "all but divisible by 3" stop filter.
I would make this method parametric to make it clearly related the
numerical nature of the stop filter in input
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
