[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13073110#comment-13073110
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-3338:
------------------------------------------
Yes, it's different than MatchAllDocsQuery.
Does WildcardQuery("field", "*",...) work the same way as
TermRangeQuery("field", null, null,...)? I mean, do they have the same
performance?
I just tested classic qp and it does support [* TO *], so I think it's fine if
we support the same on standard query parser. Just wondering weather we could
somehow optimize it.
> Flexible query parser does not support open ranges and range queries with
> mixed inclusive and exclusive ranges
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/queryparser
> Affects Versions: 3.3
> Reporter: Vinicius Barros
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: week9-merged-nosurround.patch,
> week9-merged-nosurround_with_failing_junit.patch, week9-merged.patch,
> week9.patch
>
>
> Flexible query parser does not support open ranges and range queries with
> mixed inclusive and exclusive ranges.
> These two problems were found while developing LUCENE-1768.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
