[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16671772#comment-16671772
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-12932:
---------------------------------------
[~risdenk] My question is more whether we should just be running plain "ant
test". I'd expect to see things like the IndexSizeTriggerTest fail for others.
I know that test, for instance, is getting active attention. It seems to be a
bear to figure out how to fix though. Don't want to flood Mark with extraneous
junk.
Thanks for the steps though, I was a little nervous about the fact that I had a
compilation error when I applied the patch, so I'll give your process a shot.
So far the compile step didn't fail.
[[email protected]] This brings the problems I reported this morning into
question, probably should ignore them and/or delete the comment,
> ant test (without badapples=false) should pass easily for developers.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12932
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12932
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Tests
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Priority: Major
>
> If we fix the tests we will end up here anyway, but we can shortcut this.
> Once I get my first patch in, anyone who mentions a test that fails locally
> for them at any time (not jenkins), I will fix it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
