I think SOLR-12891 might want to get into 7.6

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:27 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hmmmm, my off-the-cuff reaction is that this feels too early.
>
> In the back of my mind I had the 7.6 release roughly coinciding with
> 8.0 to tie the 7x code line up in a bow. I suppose it doesn't really
> matter if it is Solr 7.7 or later if we want something coincident with
> 8.0 though.
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:38 PM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > To follow up from our discussion on the 8.0 thread, I would like to cut
> the 7.6 branch on either Tuesday or Wednesday of next week. Since this
> implies feature freeze I went ahead and had a look at some of the issues
> that are labeled for 7.6.
> >
> > It looks like we only have one active issue listed as a blocker for
> Solr. The upgrade notes in SOLR-12927
> >
> > For Lucene we have five active issues (each with a patch provided)
> listed as blockers targeted for 7.6.
> >
> > If there are any other issues that need to land before cutting the
> branch, and they are not already labeled, please either mark them as
> blockers accordingly or let me know prior to cutting the branch next
> Tuesday or Wednesday.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > - Nick
> > --
> >
> > Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
> > Geospatial Software Guy  |  Elasticsearch
> > Apache Lucene Committer
> > nkn...@apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-- 
http://www.the111shift.com

Reply via email to