[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16674051#comment-16674051
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-6328:
------------------------------------
[^SOLR-6328.patch]
[~hossman]
I have uncommented the test added as part of SOLR-2894. The test is passing
now. Let me know if more tests need to be added here
{noformat}
ant beast -Dtestcase=DistributedFacetPivotLargeTest -Dbeast.iters=2
-Dtest.iters=2
{noformat}
> facet.limit=0 returns no counts, even if facet.missing=true
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6328
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: faceting
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-6328.patch
>
>
> facet.limit constraints the number of term values returned for a field when
> using facet.field or facet.pivot, but that limit is (suppose) to be
> independent of facet.missing, which adds an additional count beyond the
> facet.limit for docs that are "missing" that field.
> This works fine for facet.limit >= 1, but if you use
> {{facet.limit=0&facet.missing=true}} (ie: you are only interested in the
> missing count) you get no counts at all -- not even for the missing count.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
