[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16675132#comment-16675132
]
Elizabeth Haubert commented on LUCENE-8544:
-------------------------------------------
No, no it is not. Looking at the comment at the end of 8531.
> In SpanNearQuery, add support for inOrder semantics equivalent to that of
> (Multi)PhraseQuery
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8544
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Reporter: Michael Gibney
> Priority: Minor
>
> As discussed in LUCENE-8531, the semantics of phrase search differs among
> {{(Multi)PhraseQuery}}, {{SpanNearQuery (inOrder=true)}}, and {{SpanNearQuery
> (inOrder=false)}}:
> * {{(Multi)PhraseQuery}}: incorporates the concept of order, and allowsÂ
> negative offsets in calculating slop/edit distance
> * {{SpanNearQuery (inOrder=true)}}: incorporates the concept of order, and
> does _not_ allow negative offsets in calculating slop/edit distance
> * {{SpanNearQuery (inOrder=false)}}: does not incorporate the concept of
> order at all
> This issue concerns the possibility of adjusting {{SpanNearQuery}} to be
> configurable to support semantics equivalent to that of
> {{(Multi)PhraseQuery}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
