Hi, > Do we have any plans to release any Solr with minimal versions 9 or > 10? I'm wondering if it makes sense to stop testing 9 and 10 and plan > on the next supported Java version being 11 (whenever we do that).
I don't think, we should now switch to Java 11 as minimum version yet. I'd propose to do this after release of Lucene 8 (once branch_8x is created) and only do that in the master branch. Of course, we can leave out Java 9 and 10 and jump to 11. But interestingly: Java 9 and Java 10 are as stable as Java 8 (approx same number of failures). Java 11 caused many more failures in Solr because of some changes in TLS infrastructure (Java's support for TLS 1.3). We may need to work on those problems. > > reduce the noise for failed tests from 9 and 10 > > repurpose those runs for more testing of 8 or 11 or 12 > > I don't have any strong feelings either way, it just popped into my > head and I thought I'd ask. See above, 9 and 10 are as satbel as 8, it's Java 11 and 12 that cause more noise (of course this does not count crashes in some JVM versions). Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
