[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13073522#comment-13073522
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3354:
---------------------------------------
What are thoughts on using DocValues rather then FieldCache?
If we do choose to extend the FieldCache architecture, it would be so much
cleaner if it were a simple Map<K,V> directly on the Reader rather then a
static thing holding a WeakHashMap<Reader,Cache>
> Extend FieldCache architecture to multiple Values
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3354
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Bill Bell
>
> I would consider this a bug. It appears lots of people are working around
> this limitation,
> why don't we just change the underlying data structures to natively support
> multiValued fields in the FieldCache architecture?
> Then functions() will work properly, and we can do things like easily
> geodist() on a multiValued field.
> Thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
