I’m not a big fan of console/file magic. If that is done, there needs to be a 
big WARN at the beginning that says some log messages are suppressed because a 
console has been detected.

wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)

> On Nov 27, 2018, at 6:00 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Maybe we can have it both ways: might the distinction be done between console 
> & files?  So for example keep the console more brief, but have the log files 
> contain more logs?  Just an idea.
> 
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 8:07 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> bq: Maybe the real thing to do since everyone's preferences vary is to
> have a --log-config start script option that points solr at one's
> favorite dev/testing/demo oriented logging config
> 
> There's already LOG4J_PROPS so if you have a favorite log4j config you
> want to use, just set that env variable and forget about it, does that
> work?
> 
> I spent a fair amount of time untangling the multiple log config files
> down to two, I would be loathe to add any more config files to the
> release. We could also expand the one we _do_ release for with
> comments for various options...
> 
> Best,
> Erick
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
> 
> -- 
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer (PMC), Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley 
> <http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley> | Book: 
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com 
> <http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com/>

Reply via email to