[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16705390#comment-16705390 ]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-12839: --------------------------------- {quote}my main objection was going to be the name "approximate" which highly suggests that an estimate is fine. "prelim_sort" seems fine. {quote} +1 ... i hadn't considered that. I'm glad i disliked it for other reasons > add a 'resort' option to JSON faceting > -------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-12839 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12839 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: Facet Module > Reporter: Hoss Man > Assignee: Hoss Man > Priority: Major > Fix For: master (8.0), 7.7 > > Attachments: SOLR-12839.patch, SOLR-12839.patch, SOLR-12839.patch, > SOLR-12839.patch > > > As discusssed in SOLR-9480 ... > bq. Similar to how the {{rerank}} request param allows people to collect & > score documents using a "cheap" query, and then re-score the top N using a > ore expensive query, I think it would be handy if JSON Facets supported a > {{resort}} option that could be used on any FacetRequestSorted instance right > along side the {{sort}} param, using the same JSON syntax, so that clients > could have Solr internaly sort all the facet buckets by something simple > (like count) and then "Re-Sort" the top N=limit (or maybe ( > N=limit+overrequest ?) using a more expensive function like skg() -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org