[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16709022#comment-16709022
 ] 

Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-8581:
----------------------------------------

{quote}Just for my curiosity. when creating a triangle in the tessellator 
points get order. is that really needed? what is the purpose?
{quote}
That can be removed. It's legacy from before the selective indexing approach 
was used. It sounds like that will solve a big part of the problem

+1 for using 2^3 constants. And I also think we can continue to iterate on the 
readability part in a separate patch. I don't think it should hold up the 
bigger benefit of a smaller index.

 

 

> Change LatLonShape encoding to use 4 BYTES Per Dimension
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8581
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8581
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Nicholas Knize
>            Assignee: Ignacio Vera
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: LUCENE-8581.patch, LUCENE-8581.patch
>
>
> {{LatLonShape}} tessellated triangles currently use a relatively naive 
> encoding with the first four dimensions as the bounding box of the triangle 
> and the last three dimensions as the vertices of the triangle. To encode the 
> {{x,y}} vertices in the last three dimensions requires {{bytesPerDim}} to be 
> set to 8, with 4 bytes for the x & y axis, respectively. We can reduce 
> {{bytesPerDim}} to 4 by encoding the index(es) of the vertices shared by the 
> bounding box along with the orientation of the triangle. This also opens the 
> door for supporting {{CONTAINS}} queries.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to