[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16717253#comment-16717253
]
mosh commented on SOLR-12952:
-----------------------------
[~elyograg],
{quote}If you use TLOG/PULL replica types (new in 7.x) then all replicas will
be absolutely identical, and this can't happen.{quote}
Thanks a lot,
we have changed our replication type to TLOG/,
and noticed more consistent behaviour, as expected.
Oddly enough,
around once a week,
we notice a small difference in the maxDoc values between our 2
replicas(replication factor 2),
which we manually deal with via index optimize.
Is this expected or abnormal behaviour?
If so,
should we file a bug?
Thanks in advance.
> TFIDF scorer uses max docs instead of num docs when using Edismax
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12952
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12952
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: mosh
> Priority: Major
>
> I have recently noticed some odd behavior while using the edismax query
> parser.
> The scores returned by documents seem to be affected by deleted documents,
> which have yet to be merged and completely removed from the index.
> This causes different replicas to return different scores for the same query.
> Is this a bug, or am I missing something?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
