[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16719035#comment-16719035
]
Christian Ziech commented on LUCENE-8606:
-----------------------------------------
I'm running them right now - somehow I remembered that there was a jenkins job
that would auto-verify patches in tickets. But most likely I remembered that
wrong.
> ConstantScoreQuery looses explain details of wrapped query
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8606
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Christian Ziech
> Priority: Major
> Attachments:
> 0001-LUCENE-8606-adding-a-constructor-for-the-ConstantSco.patch,
> 0001-LUCENE-8606-overwriting-the-explain-method-for-Cachi.patch
>
>
> Right now the ConstantScoreWeigth used by the ConstantScoreQuery is not
> adding the details of the wrapped query to the explanation.
> {code}
> if (exists) {
> return Explanation.match(score, getQuery().toString() + (score == 1f ? ""
> : "^" + score));
> } else {
> return Explanation.noMatch(getQuery().toString() + " doesn't match id " +
> doc);
> }
> {code}
> This is kind of inconvenient as it makes it kind of hard to figure out which
> term finally really matched when one e.g. puts a BooleanQuery into the FILTER
> clause of another BooleanQuery.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
