Sounds reasonable. From the looks of the license Simon posted on legal-discuss, I doubt it will be an issue, but I just want to make sure we are clear on whatever it is before we accept it.
On Aug 10, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Aug 9, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >> >>>> OK, so I'm +1 to the idea, pending the IP, licenses, etc. check out. >>> as far as I understand the process here this vote is only to show that >>> we basically accept this contribution so this has no direct impact on >>> accepting the grant or anything like that. >> >> Correct and I'm saying I'm withholding my vote that we accept it until the >> IP clears. The whole vote is moot if the licenses don't check out and we >> can't accept it due to legal issues. > > I'm not sure this is a total dealbreaker If the IP on IPADIC doesn't > check out. Worst case, we could do the modifications and initially > only support naist-jdic (pure BSD license): > http://sourceforge.jp/projects/naist-jdic/ > Not ideal, but still an escape hatch for the worst-case. > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
