Github user dsmiley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/531
Nonetheless we could stop trying to solve this ambiguous case further _for
now_ (thus commit what you have here) since (a) this syntax is very
experimental (b) it's documented nowhere (c) and wasn't developed very openly.
RE openness; given (a) & (b), the non-openness of (c) is okay but if we
_really_ want to make this feature known, it deserves it's own issue to discuss
with the syntax ought to be publicly. A syntax to match paths is big enough
that it shouldn't be buried within the scope of some other issue.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
