[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13087453#comment-13087453
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2565:
--------------------------------

Summary of IRC discussion (as i remember it) that didn't make it to the mailing 
list...
* Use and rmuir found that they could consistently reproduce "slow" and "fast" 
behavior in some tests using fixed seeds...
** {{ant test -Dtestcase=SolrExampleBinaryTest -Dtests.seed=1:1:1}} ... always 
slow
** {{ant test -Dtestcase=SolrExampleBinaryTest -Dtests.seed=2:2:2}} ... always 
fast
* for Uwe and sarowe (on windows), slow ment "taking so long they finally just 
had to give up and kill the JVM"
* For rmuir on his linux box, slow vs. fast was ~1-10 seconds vs 100 seconds
* For hossman on my linux box, results were roughly consistent with rmuir, but 
slightly slower since i have a crappier box
* with the path Uwe commited in r1159448 rmuir, uwe, and sarowe all agreed the 
tests were "fast" again
* testUnicode (where the majority of the slowness is seen) is one of the few 
test methods in these slow classes that uses random testing in a loop, so the 
compounded speed issues there are likely from some cumulative slow down that is 
typically only done rarely in other tests (likely "commit" given the nature of 
the commit that seemed to cause the problem)
* Jenkin's is using a test multiplier of "3" which is specifically used in 
testUnicode to pick the number of iterations, so that obviously compounds the 
effects of this slowdown in jenkins -- but makes me highly suspicious about why 
Uwe and sarowe were seeing so much longer test times on their windows machines 
then rmuir or i were seeing on linux (since they weren't using any special test 
multiplier)



> Prevent IW#close and cut over to IW#commit
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2565
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: update
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-2565-revert.patch, SOLR-2565.patch, 
> SOLR-2565.patch, SOLR-2565.patch, dump.txt, slowtests.txt
>
>
> Spinnoff from SOLR-2193. We already have a branch to work on this issue here 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/solr2193 
> The main goal here is to prevent solr from closing the IW and use IW#commit 
> instead. AFAIK the main issues here are:
> The update handler needs an overhaul.
> A few goals I think we might want to look at:
> 1. Expose the SolrIndexWriter in the api or add the proper abstractions to 
> get done what we now do with special casing:
> 2. Stop closing the IndexWriter and start using commit (still lazy IW init 
> though).
> 3. Drop iwAccess, iwCommit locks and sync mostly at the Lucene level.
> 4. Address the current issues we face because multiple original/'reloaded' 
> cores can have a different IndexWriter on the same index.
> Eventually this is a preparation for NRT support in Solr which I will create 
> a followup issue for.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to