I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a volunteer
for the backport or should I do it ?

Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>
> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
> getting 7.7.1 out.
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
> >
> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the
> RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
> >
> > Anshum
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
> etc).
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins,
> and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I
> can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0,
> and the fix is already available.
> >>>
> >>> -0
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
> >>> <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
> >>>>
> >>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <jim...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Here’s my +1
> >>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > Adrien
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to