[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088743#comment-13088743
]
David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-3391:
---------------------------------------------
(1) I was also hesitant to add the generics, because I wasn't sure about the
warnings it gave. So I'll remove that happily.
(2) And I guess the method parameter in queryNorm?
(3) I'm pretty bad at naming things, so I'd take your advice in this. :) Is
BasicSimilarityProvider OK?
> Make EasySimilarityProvider a full-fledged class
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3391
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core/query/scoring, general/javadocs
> Reporter: David Mark Nemeskey
> Assignee: David Mark Nemeskey
> Labels: gsoc, gsoc2011, rank, similarity
> Fix For: flexscoring branch
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3391.patch, LUCENE-3391.patch, LUCENE-3391.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> The {{EasySimilarityProvider}} in {{TestEasySimilarity}} would be a good
> candidate for a full-fledged class. Both {{DefaultSimilarity}} and
> {{BM25Similarity}} have their own providers, which are effectively the
> same,so I don't see why we couldn't add one generic provider for convenience.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
