Separate issue would make sense I think? But, we are trying to move FC under IR control (Martijn has a patch), at which point an RT IR could have its own appending impl...?
But then... FC still returns fixed arrays so you can't append until we fix that? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jason Rutherglen <[email protected]> wrote: > LUCENE-2312 needs appendable field caches. I can include this > functionality into LUCENE-2312, or separate it out into a separate > issue / patch. > > However it would only be useful for RT / LUCENE-2312. Also, I'm not > sure how this functionality relates to doc values. If we used doc > values, then we would not be able to port LUCENE-2312 to Lucene 3.x. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
