I’d like to ask people to comment on SOLR-12809 (actually, maybe it should be a Lucene JIRA). It’s related in that we are getting more and more questions about whether Solr/Lucene version X works with Java Y….
We need to have a consistent story, inquiring minds want to know…. > On Mar 19, 2019, at 2:01 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1, let's do it. > > I can take care of commenting out the MR-JAR parts and migrating from > lucene.Future* to java.util.* (but we should not remove it from build files, > so we can use MR-JARS in the same way in future). > > Just open an issue once the vote has passed, I'l take care of removing the > Future* classes. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 7:23 PM >> To: Lucene Dev <[email protected]> >> Subject: [VOTE] Master/9.0 to require Java 11 >> >> Hello, >> >> Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring >> Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between >> 7.0 and 8.0, so if we assume a similar interval between 8.0 and 9.0 >> that would mean releasing 9.0 about 2 years after Java 11, which >> sounds like a conservative requirement to me. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> -- >> Adrien >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
